Rabbit should be pets. Pets are now defined as animals and plants that are raised for non -economic purposes. It is necessary to define pets legally. So, what kind of "thing" is in line with the definition of pets required by law? How should the law be defined by the difference between pets and ordinary animals? What are the practical problems of the debate of pet definition? Talking about it? Pets, people usually associate it with many small animals such as cats, fish, birds. However, recently, there have been new "alternative pets" that have newly appeared in the pet market such as lizards, color -changing dragons, snakes, spiders, crickets, mice and other pets that are different from our daily life or common thinking. In addition, there are also some virtual network pets in the Internet world, which constantly meets the needs of people raising pets. The rich and colorful daily life, people's continuous pursuit of new things has made various personality pets continue to appear, which is far beyond the concept of "pet" that we get used to understanding. It is difficult to completely cover some new things and new phenomena that appear in the changing daily life. Therefore, it is particularly important to re -define "pets", because the definition of it is related to our daily life. How to define the concept of pets, the width and width of pet irrigation scope will affect our daily life and the relationship with other people. This is not only a common sense issue, but also a legal issue, because we all live in society in society Among them, they all live in the interaction and contact with other people, and they all live in an open environment that gets along with nature and animals. The relationship between people, pets, pets and pets may cause legal relationships or problems Essence So what is a pet? How to identify pets is particularly important. So, what are pets and how to define the difference between pets and ordinary animals? What are the legal significance of making such a definition? Regarding what is "pets", some countries and regions have defined legally. The "Animal Protection Law" in Taiwan's Taiwan region has made a clear definition of animals. First of all, Article 3, paragraph 1 of the law, The definition of animals, that is, 'animals: dogs, cats, and others are vertebrates that are raised or managed by others, including economic animals, experimental animals, pets and other animals. "In this definition, pets are included in the concept of animals and become the lower concept of animals. Therefore, it is clear that the pet can only be vertebrates and is a vertebrate that is raised or managed by others. This definition makes the extension of the pet concept is quite narrow. At present, some alternative pets or online pets that appear in our lives cannot be included in this definition. It is stipulated, but some people think that the definition of pets is very complicated and does not need to be defined, but some people think that pets should deal with conceptualization. And its range should be broad, and even some views should be incorporated into the pets of the pet. What kind of "thing" is in line with the legal definition of pets? First, the "pet" required by law should be based on the pets that are understood in actual life or people's daily life, and at the same time The concept of pets in general, because the law is based on rights and obligations, and the legal definition of pets is the positioning and distribution of rights and obligations. Some people think that plants should be included in the scope of pets. It is unnecessary. First of all, this is inconsistent with the content of the "pet" that we usually mention. The main function of the law is confirmation rather than creation. It is not for some kind of creation to allow people to obey. If the plants are included in the category of pets, it is bound to change the habits and thinking of people's daily life. Plants are static items, and they can have been the object of people planted for a long time, such as raising flowers and bonsai. Because they present static, there are fewer disputes and disputes between plants. The relationship is relatively simple, even if there is, it involves disputes between adjacent relationships. Therefore, there is no need to incorporate plants into the pets of pets. By discussing whether the plant is included in the problem of the pet, we get at least such this kind of Conclusion, the definition of pets should be in line with people's basic thinking habits and behaviors, and should be centered on the provisions and distribution of rights and obligations. Second, the "pet" stipulated in the law should be "things". It can be a reality or an abstract thing. One thing to become a "pet" stipulated in the law should be able to be purchased and raised by people, and because of purchasing and breeding as a legal property for its breeders. People think that this "person" should be a person who has the ability of civil behavior in law, but this understanding obviously limits the scope of people who have pets. In fact, they deprive people of people without civil behavior. The breeding of fixed objects is not much related to the ability of civil behavior. Only when the pets they raise cause or other legal stipulated in other laws, whether the pets they have raised to others have a sense of civil behavior, because at this time, it is decided to decide Is it responsible for the breeder or The guardian of its guardians should be responsible, and even if the breeder does not have the ability to civil behavior, his guardian may bear civil liability. Therefore, whether it has civil abilities does not affect people's breeding pets and pets; a series of subsequent issues in the future will not have an impact. Therefore, the "people" at this time should be people in a general sense. Another thing worth noting is that pets should be a legal property for their breeds or owners. The legal here not only refers to the legal source of their pets, but also the breeding. When illegal means, if the "pet" is not allowed to be raised by the law, they cannot be called pets. The minimum standard for becoming a pet in law should be raised and traded arbitrarily in law. As a property in civil law, it should be significantly different from wild animals. Regulations: "Wild animals specified in this Law are precious, endangered terrestrial aquatic wildlife and cananed wild animals with beneficial or important economic and scientific research values. Refers to the protected wildlife stipulated in the preceding paragraph. The protection of other aquatic wild animals other than aquatic wildlife other than aquatic wildlife, which is suitable for the protection of fishery laws. " When they make clear rules, the definition of wild animals and pets is different, and it is clear that the feeding of the wild animals that cannot be a pet or which animals cannot be protected by law or even violates the law. Third, pets in cities must involve the relationship between neighbors and other residents and environments in the community. Therefore, the definition of pets is clearly defined, and which pets cannot be raised. For example, some cities have raised chickens and ducks in residential communities as pets and cause neighborhood disputes. Then, whether ordinary chickens and ducks can become pets can inevitably involve many practical problems. Therefore, the clear definition of the concept of pets has also played a role in fixing. Fourth, the "SARS" and "bird flu", which once talked about tiger color changes, are caused by animal carrying viruses. Therefore, in public places, which animals can become pets and how to travel, it involves legal issues in public health. During the epidemiography of infectious diseases such as "SARS" and "bird flu", some local regulations have provided regulations on the problems of carrying fixed objects in public transport facilities to enter transportation on whether poultry animals such as chickens and ducks can enter transportation. The problems of facilities and public space involve clear definitions of pets. Fifth, whether some animals that can become a disabled person can be stipulated within the scope of pets. If the scope of the pet into the pet will follow the same regulations as the breeding of other pets, there are other special regulations It will cause many practical problems. It can be seen that there is no clear statement about the division and definition of pets at present, but some of the problems we have proposed here will help deepen our understanding of pets and clarify pets in the future to clarify pets in the future. Definition is helpful. Puffy is artificially domesticated poultry, such as chickens, ducks, goose and so on. "Liangshu · Bi Chuan He Yan": "There are different birds like cranes, red, gathered lobby, tamed like poultry." Patsunsen, 鸂鶒 禽 like poultry. "Song Hanqi's" Trigger Trigger Gull Pavilion "poem:" Gull knows again, and it is not afraid of poultry to others. " 2. Qian called his son. Qing Sun Zhiwei's "Stay on the Mountain" poem: "Poultry poultry is the prodigy of the gods, and the birds turn the pity." Birds domesticated or other purposes. The breeding of poultry has cultivated many world -precious varieties in China for thousands of years in China. If the duck is domesticated from the green head duck, the Beijing duck is a good variety. It produces 70-120 eggs an annual output, and the Beijing roast duck made of Beijing is well -known. Poultry . Other common poultry includes: goose domesticated, home chicken, which is domesticated from the original chicken. In addition to providing human flesh and eggs, their feathers and feces also have important economic value.
Rabbit should be pets. Pets are now defined as animals and plants that are raised for non -economic purposes. It is necessary to define pets legally. So, what kind of "thing" is in line with the definition of pets required by law? How should the law be defined by the difference between pets and ordinary animals? What are the practical problems of the debate of pet definition? Talking about it? Pets, people usually associate it with many small animals such as cats, fish, birds. However, recently, there have been new "alternative pets" that have newly appeared in the pet market such as lizards, color -changing dragons, snakes, spiders, crickets, mice and other pets that are different from our daily life or common thinking. In addition, there are also some virtual network pets in the Internet world, which constantly meets the needs of people raising pets. The rich and colorful daily life, people's continuous pursuit of new things has made various personality pets continue to appear, which is far beyond the concept of "pet" that we get used to understanding. It is difficult to completely cover some new things and new phenomena that appear in the changing daily life. Therefore, it is particularly important to re -define "pets", because the definition of it is related to our daily life. How to define the concept of pets, the width and width of pet irrigation scope will affect our daily life and the relationship with other people. This is not only a common sense issue, but also a legal issue, because we all live in society in society Among them, they all live in the interaction and contact with other people, and they all live in an open environment that gets along with nature and animals. The relationship between people, pets, pets and pets may cause legal relationships or problems Essence So what is a pet? How to identify pets is particularly important. So, what are pets and how to define the difference between pets and ordinary animals? What are the legal significance of making such a definition? Regarding what is "pets", some countries and regions have defined legally. The "Animal Protection Law" in Taiwan's Taiwan region has made a clear definition of animals. First of all, Article 3, paragraph 1 of the law, The definition of animals, that is, 'animals: dogs, cats, and others are vertebrates that are raised or managed by others, including economic animals, experimental animals, pets and other animals. "In this definition, pets are included in the concept of animals and become the lower concept of animals. Therefore, it is clear that the pet can only be vertebrates and is a vertebrate that is raised or managed by others. This definition makes the extension of the pet concept is quite narrow. At present, some alternative pets or online pets that appear in our lives cannot be included in this definition. It is stipulated, but some people think that the definition of pets is very complicated and does not need to be defined, but some people think that pets should deal with conceptualization. And its range should be broad, and even some views should be incorporated into the pets of the pet. What kind of "thing" is in line with the legal definition of pets? First, the "pet" required by law should be based on the pets that are understood in actual life or people's daily life, and at the same time The concept of pets in general, because the law is based on rights and obligations, and the legal definition of pets is the positioning and distribution of rights and obligations. Some people think that plants should be included in the scope of pets. It is unnecessary. First of all, this is inconsistent with the content of the "pet" that we usually mention. The main function of the law is confirmation rather than creation. It is not for some kind of creation to allow people to obey. If the plants are included in the category of pets, it is bound to change the habits and thinking of people's daily life. Plants are static items, and they can have been the object of people planted for a long time, such as raising flowers and bonsai. Because they present static, there are fewer disputes and disputes between plants. The relationship is relatively simple, even if there is, it involves disputes between adjacent relationships. Therefore, there is no need to incorporate plants into the pets of pets. By discussing whether the plant is included in the problem of the pet, we get at least such this kind of Conclusion, the definition of pets should be in line with people's basic thinking habits and behaviors, and should be centered on the provisions and distribution of rights and obligations. Second, the "pet" stipulated in the law should be "things". It can be a reality or an abstract thing. One thing to become a "pet" stipulated in the law should be able to be purchased and raised by people, and because of purchasing and breeding as a legal property for its breeders. People think that this "person" should be a person who has the ability of civil behavior in law, but this understanding obviously limits the scope of people who have pets. In fact, they deprive people of people without civil behavior. The breeding of fixed objects is not much related to the ability of civil behavior. Only when the pets they raise cause or other legal stipulated in other laws, whether the pets they have raised to others have a sense of civil behavior, because at this time, it is decided to decide Is it responsible for the breeder or The guardian of its guardians should be responsible, and even if the breeder does not have the ability to civil behavior, his guardian may bear civil liability. Therefore, whether it has civil abilities does not affect people's breeding pets and pets; a series of subsequent issues in the future will not have an impact. Therefore, the "people" at this time should be people in a general sense. Another thing worth noting is that pets should be a legal property for their breeds or owners. The legal here not only refers to the legal source of their pets, but also the breeding. When illegal means, if the "pet" is not allowed to be raised by the law, they cannot be called pets. The minimum standard for becoming a pet in law should be raised and traded arbitrarily in law. As a property in civil law, it should be significantly different from wild animals. Regulations: "Wild animals specified in this Law are precious, endangered terrestrial aquatic wildlife and cananed wild animals with beneficial or important economic and scientific research values. Refers to the protected wildlife stipulated in the preceding paragraph. The protection of other aquatic wild animals other than aquatic wildlife other than aquatic wildlife, which is suitable for the protection of fishery laws. " When they make clear rules, the definition of wild animals and pets is different, and it is clear that the feeding of the wild animals that cannot be a pet or which animals cannot be protected by law or even violates the law. Third, pets in cities must involve the relationship between neighbors and other residents and environments in the community. Therefore, the definition of pets is clearly defined, and which pets cannot be raised. For example, some cities have raised chickens and ducks in residential communities as pets and cause neighborhood disputes. Then, whether ordinary chickens and ducks can become pets can inevitably involve many practical problems. Therefore, the clear definition of the concept of pets has also played a role in fixing. Fourth, the "SARS" and "bird flu", which once talked about tiger color changes, are caused by animal carrying viruses. Therefore, in public places, which animals can become pets and how to travel, it involves legal issues in public health. During the epidemiography of infectious diseases such as "SARS" and "bird flu", some local regulations have provided regulations on the problems of carrying fixed objects in public transport facilities to enter transportation on whether poultry animals such as chickens and ducks can enter transportation. The problems of facilities and public space involve clear definitions of pets. Fifth, whether some animals that can become a disabled person can be stipulated within the scope of pets. If the scope of the pet into the pet will follow the same regulations as the breeding of other pets, there are other special regulations It will cause many practical problems. It can be seen that there is no clear statement about the division and definition of pets at present, but some of the problems we have proposed here will help deepen our understanding of pets and clarify pets in the future to clarify pets in the future. Definition is helpful.
Puffy is artificially domesticated poultry, such as chickens, ducks, goose and so on. "Liangshu · Bi Chuan He Yan": "There are different birds like cranes, red, gathered lobby, tamed like poultry." Patsunsen, 鸂鶒 禽 like poultry. "Song Hanqi's" Trigger Trigger Gull Pavilion "poem:" Gull knows again, and it is not afraid of poultry to others. "
2. Qian called his son. Qing Sun Zhiwei's "Stay on the Mountain" poem: "Poultry poultry is the prodigy of the gods, and the birds turn the pity." Birds domesticated or other purposes. The breeding of poultry has cultivated many world -precious varieties in China for thousands of years in China. If the duck is domesticated from the green head duck, the Beijing duck is a good variety. It produces 70-120 eggs an annual output, and the Beijing roast duck made of Beijing is well -known. Poultry
. Other common poultry includes: goose domesticated, home chicken, which is domesticated from the original chicken. In addition to providing human flesh and eggs, their feathers and feces also have important economic value.
Rabbit, commonly known as rabbit, is a mammal rabbit -shaped rabbit family and herbivores.
poultry? That's a chicken and duck! You are a pet in 1, 2 to play, and you can sell a large group of livestock ~
It is definitely not a poultry ...
It's animals can be counted.