More than 7,000 photographed a gold bracelet worth 50,000 yuan. The merchant said that it would not be shipped. What do you think of this?

E -commerce platforms appear, many of us choose to buy online. Many well -known businesses advertise on e -commerce platforms. In order to attract consumers' attention, various advertisements are overwhelming.
撸 wool incident
is selling gold jewelry, and also appears on e -commerce platforms. Full reduction activities appear. A consumer spent more than 7,000 yuan to take three pieces of jewelry, worth more than 50,000 gold jewelry. It can be said that this consumer has picked up big cheapness, which is a particularly happy thing.
, the merchant told us "not shipping", saying that this is a page error, and then there will be special customer service to solve this problem.
I think this is a marketing method of merchants. In order to attract our consumer's attention, how can this low -level error of the page be possible.
It JD.com last time a oolong, a oven, said it was particularly cheap, a few dollars. In just a few minutes, more than 7,000 units were sold. Maybe everyone was off work because of this cheap. The merchants lost a lot of money. In the end, I did not pay attention.
This is the so -called wool, appearing on the e -commerce platform. Apple has appeared before. I don't think this is their mistake, it is intentional. In order to increase their income and make marketing methods.
Is with the emergence of e -commerce platforms, Taobao customers have appeared, and those commission payments have allowed many people to sell products for free. This platform is particularly many.
The consumer pays
I remember that a customer spent thousands of dollars last time and bought a bracelet. Later, the merchant said that this was, tens of thousands of dollars. I took the wrong time and let the customer return it back. We are consumers, and commodities are sold by merchants. The merchant made a mistake and let us return.
If this customer spent tens of thousands of dollars and bought thousands of dollars, the merchant decided not to say anything. Because merchants are mainly making money.
The customer was listened to the beer with 500, and the merchant answered that it could only be exchanged for 500 ml, which is the beer machine.
These are the merchants' own mistakes and errors, but we ask our consumers to pay. I think this is a fraud consumer.
Instackeating merchants
I don't want the merchant to make such a mistake for my own interests. From the side, say a joke. But this kind of oolong searches on the hot search, and the attention is particularly high. Originally, we only knew this brand. In just a few days, I advertised ourselves for free. It has attracted great attention, especially those who eat melon. They will comment on such things, but where do merchants take advantage of the profit. In my opinion, consumers spend more than 7,000 to buy more than 50,000 jewelry without shipping. From the perspective of merchants, it is reasonable because merchants will not make money.
It with the problem from this customer perspective, some lost. I just paid the money and thought that I had picked up the big cheap, and the merchant did not ship it. I think merchants should pay for such a mistake, not to disappoint consumers.

The question is how consumers photographed a gold bracelet of 50,000 yuan. If it was taken by normal channels, then the merchant should not do it. This is the business of the merchant's own operation. It should be responsible for itself.

illegal. The consumer is a normal transaction. The boss is very unreasonable. Consumers can respond to relevant departments.